High Court judge Mr Justice Fraser has warned of ‘draconian’ costs penalties should two parties in litigation continue to refuse to cooperate.
He said both sides in Bates & Ors v Post Office Ltd had rebuffed efforts to manage the case in a cost-effective and efficient way.
The case involves sub-post masters pursuing action against the Post Office. The claimant group is seeking damages related to the introduction of an electronic system around 17 years ago, which allegedly caused financial distress and in some cases bankruptcy.
Some of the issues reported during the litigation included:
- Failing to respond to directions for two months
- Failing to even consider e-disclosure questionnaires
- Failing to lodge required documents with the court
- Refusing to disclose obviously relevant documents
- Threatening ‘pointless’ interlocutory skirmishes.
At the case management conference, the claimants sought a substantive hearing for October 2018, while the defendants argued the case could be managed for another entire year without any substantive hearing being fixed. Under this proposal, the hearing would not happen until at least 2019.
The day after trial was ordered for November 2018, leading counsel for the defendant wrote to ask that it be moved as he already had a hearing at the Companies Court. The judge suggested it was a ‘clear case of the tail wagging the dog’ if barristers’ clerks were allowed to dictate hearing dates, and he said there was reasonable notice to arrange for a replacement counsel.
Business litigation solicitors
Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our business solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.
Call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email email@example.com.
Latest posts by Shalish Mehta (see all)
- Liverpool Football Club win High Court Case against marketing firm which introduced them to BetVictor - 14th January 2021
- COVID-19 vaccine: UK government gives Pfizer legal indemnity to protect it from being sued - 3rd December 2020
- Harry Dunn’s parents lose high court legal challenge over immunity case - 3rd December 2020
- Dementia in Football: Taskforce to be created by PFA to examine issue of brain injury diseases - 2nd December 2020
- Economy Adviser initiates legal proceedings against the government over the closure of hospitality venues - 24th October 2020