‘Last in, first out’ (LIFO) used to be one of the most common ways of objectively determining who was going to lose their jobs in a redundancy situation.
Put simply, LIFO means that when choosing people for redundancy, the longer you have been with a company the safer you are.
Is this fair though?
It may be objective, but when it comes to employment law redundancy LIFO isn’t necessarily fair when used as the sole selection criteria. Since the enactment of equality and anti-discrimination legislation, LIFO taken on its own is no longer considered as legally safe as it once was and is generally avoided by employers.
For example, younger workers are more likely to lose out under a LIFO system, as they tend to be the people who have worked for the shortest time at an organisation. As they are at a disadvantage based on their age, they may have grounds to make a claim for indirect age discrimination. Instead employers should be looking at skills based selection, that doesn’t assume that just because you’ve been there a long time you’re better at the job.
Employment Law Redundancy
Redundancy is never easy for an employer. If you face the possibility of making them, take advice at the earliest opportunity to avoid the pitfalls.
If you’re an employee, check at an early stage so that mistakes your employer might be making, can be rectified before the damage is done.
For more information or to speak to our team about our Employment Law Redundancy services please call us on 0161 624 6811
Latest posts by John Porter (see all)
- Changes to Employment Law April 2020 - 5th April 2020
- Toys R Us on brink of administration - 8th January 2018
- Talk over sale of Newcastle Utd as owner Ashley meets investment firm - 22nd December 2017
- GVC gambles on Ladbrokes Coral takeover - 15th December 2017
- UK retail sales up in October against last year - 22nd November 2017