Category: News

  • Divorce and protecting family wealth

    Divorce and protecting family wealth

    As a family solicitor specialising in the financial aspects of relationship breakdown I work closely with my colleagues in our Wills & Probate team, led by Partner Rachel Damianou.

    Clients often require help from both teams to ensure their interests are taken care of fully.

    A relationship breakdown (be the parties married or not) is a significant change in circumstances.

    It is always wise to deal with both the immediate financial consequences (payment of the mortgage and maintenance for the children for instance) and consider matters on a longer-term basis to avoid unintended and unwanted consequences.

    In relation to the latter, if you own a property jointly it is often on terms such that if one party dies their share will automatically go to the other joint owner.

    If the other owner is not whom you would wish to benefit and you’d prefer your share to go to someone else, your children for example, steps need to be taken.

    These can quickly and cheaply be taken with the writing of a Will and severance of what is called “the joint tenancy”.

    Another scenario might be the elderly parents of an adult child not wishing their assets to fall into the hands of a son/daughter in law that is separating from their child. Alternatively, if their child is to be married and they are disapproving of the union believing the intended son or daughter in law are only getting married for money’s sake.

    This anxiety can be overcome in many cases using a “discretionary trust” in the parent’s Will.

    The family assets are controlled by Trustees (often your executors) who have discretion to pay capital or income to the beneficiaries (perhaps their children and grandchildren) of the trust as they see fit.

    By guiding the Trustees as to their intentions, for example protecting assets from any divorces, the anxiety can be overcome.

    Such arrangements cannot be water tight as Divorce courts have wide powers however if it is seen that the trust is designed to cascade wealth down the generation’s courts are more likely to disregard the trust assets as a resource available for the divorcing offspring or their spouse.

    Early advice on these matters is always wise, so if you are contemplating separation or are worried about the impact of your children’s relationships breaking down please contact Rhona Royle in our Family team or Rachel Damianou in the Wills and Probate team.

    Click here to find out more about Family Lawyers
    Click here to find out more about Divorce Solicitors
    Click here to find out more about Finances on Separation
    Click here to find out more about Trust Inheritance
    Click here to find out more about Making a Will

  • Britney Spears’ father sues Free Britney blogger for defamation over conservatorship comments

    Singer Britney Spears father, Jamie Spears is suing a blogger, Anthony Elia, creator of the Absolutely Britney blog and social media accounts, for claiming that he has been mistreating his daughter.

    Britney Spears was committed to a conservatorship in 2008 after her mental health breakdowns, which means that her father is legally responsibility for her finances and daily life.

    Fans started accusing Jamie of mistreatment and Elia, recently accused Britney’s father of deleting positive comments from her Instagram to give her the impression she was doing worse than she is.

    Jamie is suing Elia for falsely suggesting he and Britney’s team are ‘using her social media in a way to negatively portray her and do her harm.’

    If you have been defamed or have been accused of making defamatory statements our Commercial Litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Click here to find out more about Litigation
    Click here to find out more about Defamation Solicitors

  • Children and Separation

    Children and Separation

    In March this year, Jack Osbourne, finalised his Divorce from wife Lisa.  Jack was spotted out and about in LA with 2 of his 3 children he shares with his ex-wife. Minnie, his 1 year old did not accompany dad on the outing. 
     
    Jack, the son of Sharon and Ozzy Osbourne, held hands together with the children as they were treated to ice creams on a sunny day. The family appeared happy and relaxed in each other’s company.
     
    Having gone through personal turmoil, Jack is spending time with the children which is extremely important when parties separate for the emotional wellbeing of the children. The children need stability and security and each parents approval and encouragement to do so. As a general rule, children should spend time with each parent as long as it is safe to do so.
     
    Often, children’s emotional stability is overlooked by separating parents in the emotional “tug of War” when parents are endeavouring to divide assets and manage the difficult emotional time for them, on separation.
     
    We at Wrigley Claydon can provide professional advice and guidance on all matters relating to children, divorce and separation, and offer a free half hour initial consultation.
     
    Please feel free to contact either Rhona Royle or Terri Pickup to arrange an appointment on 0161 624 6811.

    Click here to find out more about Arrangements for Children
    Click here to find out more about Family Lawyers

  • Airbnb threatens legal action against Scots firm Hairbnb in trademark row

    Airbnb has threatened legal action against a Scots firm named Hairbnb, which offers holiday homes for dogs. It connects licensed dog sitters, boarders and walkers with people who need their pets looked after.

    Allan Ritchie set up the dog boarding business in 2018 and applied for a trademark from the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO).

    Airbnb were given two months to object, starting from February 2018. Airbnb didn’t take any action and Mr Ritchie was given a UK trademark in May 2018.

    However, Mr Ritchie has now been sent a “cease and desist” letter from Airbnb, which has given him until the end of June 2019 to change the trademark.  

    An Airbnb spokesman said: “We want to work in partnership with companies to address these matters and hope to collaborate to resolve concerns amicably.”

    Suffering an intellectual property and technology disputes can have serious implications on your business.  Our business solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Click here to find out more about Civil Litigation
    Click here to find out more about Dispute Resolution
    Click here to find out more about Commercial Litigation
    Click here to find out more about Intellectual Property Solicitors

  • Domestic abuse isn’t always physical

    We have recently seen an increase in clients seeking advice regarding a relationship breakdown due to domestic abuse that is not physical but falls into the category of behaviour referred to as “coercive control”

    Coercive control is defined as “an act or a pattern of acts of assaults, threats, humiliation and intimidation or other abuse that is used to harm punish or frighten the victim.” This form of domestic abuse only became an offence in England and Wales in 2015.

    We are seeing more cases where coercive control is a feature. Often perpetrators believe that as they are causing no physical injury their behaviour is acceptable, it is not.

    The recent case of Sally Challen highlights the issue of coercive control. Sally was convicted of the murder of her husband in 2010 but her conviction was quashed in February. She was due to face a second trial for murder next month, however, she has now had her conviction reduced to manslaughter and due to the time she had already spent in prison she is now free.

    The BBC report that Mr Justice Edis said the killing came after “years of controlling, isolating and humiliating conduct” with the added provocation of her husband’s “serial multiple infidelity”.

    The Guardian report that this has “become a landmark case on coercive control”.

    Sources:

    https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jun/07/sally-challen-will-not-face-retrial-for-killing-husband

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-48554239

    If you believe you may be the victim of coercive control please contact a member of our team for confidential advice and assistance regarding your options. We can offer support and legal advice at a distressing and difficult time.

    Please telephone to speak to either Rhona Royle or Terri Pickup on 0161 624 6811.

    We aim to deal with all our clients sensitively and with empathy, offering professional advice throughout.

    Click here to find out more about Family Lawyers
    Click here to find out more about Domestic Abuse

  • Ex-soldier wins right to appeal against Diplock trial

    A former soldier has begun his appeal to the Supreme Court against a decision to try him in a Diplock Court.

    A Diplock Court is a non-jury trial heard by a judge only. Diplock courts were introduced in 1973 in an attempt to deal with terrorist offences during the Troubles.

    The former soldier is due to be tried for attempted murder in connection with a fatal shooting in Northern Ireland in 1974.

    The Government technically abolished the old Diplock courts in 2007.

    However, the Government gave the Director of Public Prosecutions temporary power to decide that exceptional cases should be tried without a jury if he believed there was still a risk of jurors being intimidated.

     

  • Living Well – 10th April 2019

    Living Well – 10th April 2019

    We will be attending the ‘Living Well’ event taking place at our Saddleworth Clinic in the 10th April in conjunction with the Saddleworth Churches group.

    Please do attend if you would like to talk to us about Wills and Powers of Attorney.

  • Marc Jacobs Wants Nirvana’s Copyright Lawsuit Dismissed

    Lawyers for fashion designer Marc Jacobs have filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit made against him by the estate of the band Nirvana, which accuses him of copyright infringement.

    The designer’s collection features a cartoon “smiley face” similar to the one used by Nirvana as their logo, along with the word “Heaven” printed in the distinctive typeface used by the band. The lawsuit argues that Jacobs intentionally used “Nirvana’s copyrighted image on and to promote its products” in an “oppressive, fraudulent and malicious” manner. It seeks damages and for the clothes to be removed from sale.

    Jacobs admits the designs were “inspired by vintage Nirvana concert T-shirts from the 1990s”, but argues that Jacobs “reinterpreted the design to incorporate [a Marc Jacobs] branding element into an otherwise commonplace image”.

    The motion centres on a technicality: while Nirvana do own copyright to similar artwork, it is for an entire T-shirt design with a smiley face, the word Nirvana, and the words “flower sniffin kitty pettin baby kissin corporate rock whores” written on the back. By replacing the smiley face’s crosses for eyes with the letters M and J, and the word Nirvana with Heaven, Jacobs’ motion argues that the design therefore does not infringe copyright as it is not an exact replica of the copyrighted Nirvana design.

    Suffering an intellectual property and technology disputes can have serious implications on your business. Our business solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    For more information on Civil Litigation, click here.
    For more information on Dispute Resolution, click here.
    For more information on Commercial Litigation, click here.
    For more information on Intellectual Property, click here.

  • Supreme Court Dismisses Application

    The Supreme Court, which is the UK’s highest court, has dismissed an emergency application from lawyers for Noel Conway, a retired lecturer who is paralysed from the neck down by progressive motor neurone disease, to hear a right-to-die case challenging the legal ban on assisted dying.

    The three Supreme Court justices acknowledged that the issue was of “transcendent public importance”, however, the justices decided there was little chance of success if Conway’s claim were heard in full by the court.

    The judges added that any change to the law would have to be for parliament, although it would be within the Supreme Court’s powers to make a declaration that UK law was incompatible with Conway’s rights under the European convention on human rights.

    They said Conway could bring about his own death by refusing consent to the continuation of the “non-invasive ventilation” keeping him alive.

    Helping someone kill themselves is a criminal offence carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years in prison.