Category: Commercial Litigation

  • Nike is suing New York studio MSCHF and musician Lil Nas for trademark infringement over its Satan Shoes

    Nike is suing New York studio MSCHF for trademark infringement over its Satan Shoes, collaboration with musician Lil Nas X that customised 666 pairs of trainers with human blood and pentagrams.

    Nike said the altered shoes, which still display its signature swoosh logo, are causing people to believe “Nike is endorsing Satanism” and causing “calls to boycott” their brand.

    The altered Nike Air Max 97s sold out in under a minute at a cost of $1,018 a pair.

    Nike has asked for MSCHF to pay damages and legal fees and is seeking an intervention to stop the orders of Satan Shoes from being fulfilled.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Former footballer turned agent, Barry Silkman wins £800,000 legal battle over ex-wife’s estate

    Barry Silkman, a former Manchester city footballer turned agent, has won an £800,000 court action over his ex-wife’s estate.

    Mr Silkman sued Gaven Love over the Will of Ally Fuller. Mr Silkman split from Ms Fuller in 2003 and she became engaged to Mr Love in 2007.

    Ms Fuller died of cancer in 2016 and left her estate to her daughter. No share of a house was included in the estate as it was bought in Mr Love’s sole name.

    Mr Silkman – as administrator of Ms Fuller’s estate – sued for a share of the property claiming it belonged to his ex-wife and so should go to their daughter as Ms Fuller put significant funds into the property.

    Mr Silkman won his case after a judge ruled that the daughter “should not be kept out of her inheritance”. He relied on a letter written by Ms Fuller and later discovered unsent on her computer.

    Addressed to Mr Love and titled “a few home truths” it set out that it had been agreed between them from the start that the house would be both their property.

    The judge ruled that there had been an agreement that Ms Fuller and Mr Love be joint owners by way of a “common intention constructive trust” and therefore half the equity in the house should go into Ms Fuller’s estate.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Family of Argentinian Footballer, Emiliano Sala, to launch legal action over footballer’s death

    The family of Argentine footballer Emiliano Sala are taking legal action against the footballer’s former club Cardiff City after his death in a plane crash on 21 January 2021.

    The family has commenced civil proceedings in the High Court, in order to “protect their legal rights” against 13 defendants including Cardiff City, the club Sala had signed for just three days before his death and FC Nantes, the French club which sold him for a reported £15million. The High Court proceedings have been stayed until the outcome of an inquest into the footballer’s death.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • UK High Court rules Health Minister, Matt Hancock acted unlawfully in granting Covid-19 contracts

    The UK High Court has ruled that Health Minister Matt Hancock “acted unlawfully by failing to comply with the Transparency Policy” in granting Covid-19 contracts.

    The ruling followed a judicial review against the government’s failure to publish its contracts with private companies involved in the response to the pandemic.

    The government used emergency powers under the Coronavirus Act 2020 to bypass normal contract tendering process.

    In April 2020, the government awarded a contract to Ayanda Capital Limited, a company created by an acquaintance of the minister for the international trade, for the supply of face masks. The value of the contract was £252 million. Some £160 million worth of masks purchased were unusable in the NHS.

    Clandeboye Agencies Limited, a company which previously supplied only confectionery products, was awarded a £108 million contract for the supply of gowns to the NHS.

    Crisp Websites Limited (trading as PestFix—a pest control company) secured contracts worth £345 million, despite the company having never before supplied medical PPE.

    A contract worth approximately £30 million was given to Alex Bourne’s company Hinpack to provide vials and plastic funnels for test samples despite Bourne having no experience in the manufacture of medical equipment.  Bourne previously ran a pub situated close to Hancock’s former constituency home in Suffolk and was visited frequently by Hancock.

    After the High Court ruling, Hancock stated that it was “in the national interest that we did what we did.” Despite the well-publicised cases backed by surveys carried out by the Royal College of Nursing and Unison of nurses going to work in April wearing bin liners as PPE, Hancock insisted that “there wasn’t a national shortage [of PPE] at any point… “because of the work” his team did.

    I am text block. Click edit button to change this text. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.

  • Qualcomm is being sued over alleged anti-competitive behavior in the UK

    Consumer group Which is suing Qualcomm, a US manufacturer of computer chips, alleging that it breached UK competition law by taking advantage of its dominance in the patent-licensing and chipset market. This enabled Qualcomm to charge manufacturers such as Apple and Samsung inflated fees for technology licenses, which in turn has been passed on to consumers in the form of higher smartphone prices.

    Which is seeking damages for all affected Apple and Samsung smartphones purchased since 1 October 2015 and is seeking a collective total of £482.5m. It estimates that individual consumers could be entitled to up to £30 in damages if the claim is successful.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Retail trading app ‘RobinHood’ faces lawsuit against claims of market manipulation

    Retail brokerages restricted trading recently in GameStop and other stocks caused big losses for hedge funds.

    Free-stock trading pioneer Robinhood and Interactive Brokers said that in some cases, investors would be able to sell only their positions and not open new ones. Both brokerages raised margin requirements on certain securities.

    Robinhood said its decision to restrict trading, which angered many users was necessary in order to comply with capital requirements mandated by the SEC for broker dealers.

    This has led to a lawsuit being filed in New York claiming that Robinhood rigged the market against its customers. It is alleged that Robinhood’s actions were “done purposefully and knowingly to manipulate the market for the benefit of people and financial institutions who were not Robinhood’s customers”.

     

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • TikTok faces potential legal challenge from 12-year-old girl

    TikTok is facing the prospect of legal action from a 12-year-old English girl, who remains anonymous over whether the way it handles children’s data violates European Union and UK privacy laws.

    The High Court in London was told that the girl hoped the case would result in TikTok being ordered to delete the Claimant’s data, thereby setting a precedent.

    Justice Mark Warby granted anonymity to the Claimant on the grounds that if her identity were revealed she might be cyberbullied by peers or even harassed by social-media influencers “who might feel their status or earnings were under threat,” according to a High Court ruling published late last month.

    In February 2019, TikTok agreed to pay a $5.7 million fine to settle allegations from the US Federal Trade Commission it illegally collected the personal data of under-13s. In May 2019, a group of 20 advocacy groups accused TikTok of violating its 2019 settlement with the FTC, saying it still contained data relating to account holders under the age of 13.

     

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Economy Adviser initiates legal proceedings against the government over the closure of hospitality venues

    Greater Manchester’s night-time economy adviser Sacha Lord has begun legal proceedings against the government over the closure of hospitality venues.

    He stated that a judicial review began on Tuesday 20 October 2020 into the legality of implementing emergency restrictions on the hospitality sector i.e. closing pubs and bars not serving food “without any evidence” it would bring down transmissions of Covid-19.

    A pre-action letter had been filed as he awaits response from the Health Secretary Matt Hancock

    The legal challenge is supported by organisations including The Night Time Industries Association, UK Hospitality and various prominent Greater Manchester venues.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Elton John’s ex-wife Renate Blauel launches legal action against singer 32 years after split

    Sir Elton John and ex-wife Renate Blauel have settled a legal dispute caused by the singer’s autobiography and film Rocketman.

    In June 2020 Blauel alleged that John had broken the terms of the couple’s divorce deal by publicly discussing the pair’s marriage which ended in 1988.

    In the legal proceedings Blauel had asked for damages of approximately £3m and an injunction preventing any further private information being disclosed.

    John and Blauel released a joint statement, saying: “The parties are happy to announce that they have resolved this case, in a way that acknowledges Renate’s need for privacy” and “they will not be discussing each other, or their marriage, in future and will be making no further comment about the case.”

     

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Irish court says Subway bread isn’t bread

    Ireland’s Supreme Court has ruled that Subway sandwiches are too sugary to be classed as ‘bread’ and therefore are not liable for tax exemption.

    The court ruled that the sandwiches could not be categorised as a staple food, which would come with a zero VAT rate, rejecting a Subway franchise’s arguments that it was not liable for tax on some of its takeaway products.

     

    The Vat Act 1972 states that the weight of ingredients in bread such as sugar, fat and bread improver shall not exceed 2 per cent of the weight of flour in the dough.

    The Act aimed to distinguish between bread, which is considered a staple food and is taxed at zero per cent, and other baked goods made from dough, which are taxed.

     

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood and reputation.  Our dispute resolution solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.