Category: Trusts, Wills & Probate

  • What happens when a couple appear to die together and evidence fails to prove the order of their death?

    The judge in the Scarle estate dispute, in which an elderly married couple were found dead in their Essex home, has ruled that there was not enough medical evidence to determine who died first. As such the commorientes rule was invoked and the elder was deemed to have died first.

     

    The couple, who had both been married previously and had children from their previous marriages, sadly died in October 2016 from hypothermia. The autopsy evidence was confused by differing temperatures in different rooms in the house and the possibility that an intruder might have disturbed the scene.

     

    It became important to decide who had died first because joint assets would pass, all be it briefly, to the second to die by survivorship and then to their children.

     

    This case highlights the need not only to make a will, but also to consider what assets will pass under that will and whether or not inheritance should be conditional upon surviving the first to die by a specified period.

     

    For more information on wills and probate please call Rachel Damianou or Jyoti Patel on (0161) 624 6811 (option 3) or email rld@wrigleyclaydon.com

    Click here to find out more about Wills, Powers of Attorney, Probate and Trusts
    Click here to find out more about Legal Support when someone dies

  • Handwritten Wills found in Aretha Franklin’s home

    Following the recent discovery of handwritten Wills being found in Aretha Franklin’s home last month, her family has been arguing with each other over the validity and requests of Wills allegedly handwritten by Franklin before she passed away in 2018. .

    One of the Wills named her youngest son, Kecalf Franklin as the executor of her estate. However, other family members contest the Will and claim that Kecalf isn’t fit to handle such an important and valuable estate.

    Consequently, Kecalf has since filed two court petitions seeking to be made an executor of his mother’s estate, alongside Franklin’s niece, Sabrina Owens, who was appointed to the role last year – but with the intention to replace her in due course.

    Kecalf claims that Owens has “mismanaged the estate” and has “failed to perform a duty pertaining to office.”

    Franklin’s four sons are now in dispute over the issue and consequently went to court to determine if the Wills are admissible to probate. Accordingly, a handwriting expert has been hired to review the Wills but the examination has not been finalised.

    If you are seeking provision from an estate or are looking to defend a claim our Probate Partner Rachel Damianou and Litigation Solicitor Shalish Mehta provide professional and sympathetic assistance. Call Rachel or Shalish on 0161 624 6811 (Option 6) or email rld@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Click here to find out more about Litigation
    Click here to find out more about Will Disputes

  • Living Well – 10th April 2019

    Living Well – 10th April 2019

    We will be attending the ‘Living Well’ event taking place at our Saddleworth Clinic in the 10th April in conjunction with the Saddleworth Churches group.

    Please do attend if you would like to talk to us about Wills and Powers of Attorney.

  • High Court granted permission to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act despite it being issued some 25 years after the deadline

    High Court granted permission to bring a claim under the Inheritance Act despite it being issued some 25 years after the deadline

    In Bhusate v Patel & Ors  the High Court granted permission to the claimant bring a claim under the Inheritance Act despite it being issued some 25 years after the deadline for doing so, after the Claimant demonstrated ‘compelling reasons’ why it was right and proper that the court should exercise its discretion in her favour.

    The Inheritance Act limits parties to six months for bringing claims.

    The judgment also disputes the reasoning of a High Court judge who considered another out-of-time application under section 4 of the Act last month in the case of Cowan v Foreman. In Cowan the Judge said ‘robust’ application of the power to extend deadline was consistent with the overriding objective and Civil Procedure Rules requiring compliance and for the court to consider the time and resources allocated to late applications.

    Chief Master Marsh said that he had read the Cowan judgment and he did not consider it was right to regard the overriding objective when considering the exercise of discretion under section 4.

    In Bhusate, the court ruled the claimant, whose husband died intestate in 1990, was ‘effectively powerless’ to do anything sooner in the absence of agreement or engagement by her stepchildren.

    The step-children obstructed the sale of her residential property then ‘did nothing’ to break the impasse for a further 23 years and were hostile.

    Chief Master Marsh noted that if the application was not granted, the claimant would be left with no remedy at all and no benefit from her husband’s estate, and would effectively be left homeless. He acknowledged the long period of delay for making a claim to the estate, but it was not correct to say this made it inevitable that the application should be dismissed.

    If you are seeking provision from an estate or are looking to defend a claim our Probate Partner Rachel Damianou and Litigation Solicitor Shalish Mehta provide professional and sympathetic assistance. Call Rachel or Shalish on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email rld@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    For more information on disputed wills, click here.

    If you want to find out more about civil litigation, click here.

  • Ex-wife and children of late tech tycoon win £2m share of his fortune

    The first wife and two young sons of a late IT tycoon have won a £2million share of his fortune to help them buy a ‘massive, amazing house’ he promised them.

    Louisa Simonetta, was given the sum after a lengthy legal battle in the High Court with her ex-husband’s second wife Ruby Geetha Lovell-Tomon, over his £5.2million estate. Matt Tomon died suddenly at the age of 38 three years ago, but had failed to make a will for how to share his wealth.

    She argued she wanted the cash to pay for a house in her native Australia for the family, and also fund the private education of their young sons Alexander and Julian, in accordance with Mr Tomon’s wishes.

    Shortly before his death, Mr Tomon sold his IT firm for £5.2million and deposited the funds into his new wife’s account.

    Mrs Lovell-Tomon claimed the money was an ‘outright gift’ left to her and that her husband’s US nationality and plans to move back home or to the Bahamas meant he did not have to make ‘reasonable provision’ for his ex-wife.

    Mr Justice Williams found in favour of Ms Simonetta and said Mr Tomon had clearly promised a home for her and his sons and said the parties had negotiated and agreed to a settlement of the claim, which will see the boys receive £950,000 between them from their father’s estate, with their mother awarded cash and property worth almost £1 million.

    The sums to be received were a ‘reasonable and sensible compromise’ of the case, Mr Justice Williams said.

    He added: ‘Were this action to continue, it has sadly all the hallmarks of a case that would be contested up hill and down dale; something which no doubt would have caused Matt considerable sadness.

    ‘Such is one of the consequences of failing to make provision in the form of a will or otherwise for your family.’But of course, for Louisa and the boys, the reality would be months extending into years no doubt, of litigation.

    If you are seeking provision from an estate or are looking to defend a claim our Probate Partner Rachel Damianou and Litigation Solicitor Shalish Mehta provide professional and sympathetic assistance. Call Rachel or Shalish on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email rld@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • The Law Society has recently provided some further guidance in cases where a Will is disputed.

    The Law Society has recently provided some further guidance in cases where a Will is disputed.

    If you’re leaving a will or a relative of yours has left a will, it could be open to being contested or challenged. The situations in which someone can challenge a will aren’t always straightforward.

    In England there are only limited circumstances when you can challenge a will. These are:

    – Because the will is invalid. For example, a person whose will it is was unduly influenced or coerced or because they did not have the mental ability to know what they were doing or because the will wasn’t signed or witnessed correctly.

    – Because a family member wasn’t provided for. Spouses, civil partners, children and dependants can make a claim if they haven’t been left anything/enough in the will.

    Have you been affected by any of the above? Our Probate Partner Rachel Damianou and Litigation Solicitor Shalish Mehta provide professional and sympathetic assistance. Call Rachel or Shalish on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email rld@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • A Pet is not just for Christmas

    Everyone has heard this phrase which is particularly pertinent at this time of year. We are a nation of pet lovers and yet it is estimated that thousands of pet owners in the UK also die each year without making any arrangement for their pets in the event of their death.

    If you do not make provision then you do run the risk that your beloved pet will be left unwanted, uncared for and even homeless. Your Pet may be inherited by someone who is not an animal lover. However many people will at this time of year be considering making as Will as part of their New Year’s resolution and your pets could be provided for in your Will.

    The Law treats pets as “property” and therefore it is possible to make gifts of family pets in your Will so you need to consider, is there a family member or friend who would be willing and able to look after your pet?   It is important that you discuss this with that person to make sure that they are happy to take on the responsibility of caring for your pet. Caring for your pet can be a financial burden and it is a good idea to leave in your Will, to the person whom you would like to look after your pet , a sum of money to cover the cost of caring for your pet. It is also important that you include any future pets that you may have at the date of your death in your Will and likewise it is important that you consider that if you have made any cash gifts purely for the pets’ maintenance to your chosen person, it is conditional upon the pet being alive at your death. There are also many Charities who run free re-homing schemes who you may wish to nominate to look after your Pets.

    If you don’t specifically mention your pets in your Will they may be inherited by someone who is not an animal lover.

    For advice on including pets in your Will or making a Will generally, please contact Rachel Damianou or Jyoti Patel on 0161 624 6811 (Option 3) or call into our Clinic details of which are below.

  • Dr Kershaw’s Will Week

    Dr Kershaw’s Will Week

    Next week we are participating in Dr Kershaw’s will week where in return for a donation to the hospice ( £100 for an individual, £150 for a couple) we will provide clients with a free will.

    Dr Kershaw's Hospice Will Week
    Dr Kershaw's Hospice Will Week