Author:

  • Actor Noel Clarke seeks £10m in defamation case against The Guardian

    Actor Noel Clarke has vowed to push ahead with his £10 million libel claim against The Guardian after a judge’s ruling on newspaper articles accusing Clarke of bullying and sexual misconduct against women.

    Clarke was suspended by Bafta in light of the allegations, his film and TV projects were axed, and he was “cancelled” by the entertainment industry, the High Court was told.

    He argued ordinary Guardian readers would have believed the claims against him were true, rather than disputed allegations.

    The Guardian’s position was that it its readers would have learned that there were “reasonable grounds to suspect” Clarke of misconduct.

    In a preliminary ruling, Mr Justice Johnson said the first article against Clarke had conveyed the meaning that “there are strong grounds to believe that the claimant is a serial abuser of women, that he has, over 15 years, used his power to prey on and harass and sometimes bully female colleagues, that he has engaged in unwanted sexual contact, kissing, touching or groping, sexually inappropriate behaviour and comments, and professional misconduct, taking and sharing explicit pictures and videos without consent, including secretly filming a young actor’s naked audition.”

    The judge also ruled all of the articles could be defamatory, meaning the case can move on to the next stage.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood.  Our litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in the litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • A Step-by-step guide on how to apply for a trademark in the United Kingdom

    1. Determine the Need for a Trademark:

    Make sure you have a distinctive name, logo, or slogan that you want to protect ensuring that it is not already in use by another company.

     

    1. Trademark Search:

    Conduct a trademark search to check if someone else is already using a similar or identical trademark. Use the UK Intellectual Property Office’s (IPO) online search tools or consider hiring a trademark lawyer. .

     

    1. Classify Your Goods and Services:

    Trademarks are registered for specific classes of goods and services, so choose the right classes that match your business activities.

     

    1. Create a Trademark Application:

    Visit the UK IPO’s official website (www.gov.uk/guidance/trade-marks) to access the online trademark application system.

     

    1. Complete the Application Form:

    You’ll need to provide detailed information about your trademark, including the image (if it’s a logo) and a description of the goods/services it will cover. Be precise and accurate in your application.

     

    1. Pay the Application Fee:

    The cost may vary depending on factors like the number of classes and the filing method. Check the current fee schedule on the UK IPO’s website.

     

    1. Review and Submit the Application:

    Review your application for any errors or omissions and submit electronically once satisfied. Keep a copy of the application and any payment receipts for your records.

     

    1. Examination by the UK IPO:

    They will ensure that your application meets all the legal requirements, complies with trademark laws and does not conflict with existing trademarks. This can take several months.

     

    1. Publication of the Trademark:

    If your application passes the examination, it will be published in the UK IPO’s Trademarks Journal. This allows anyone with concerns about your trademark to object within two months.

     

    1. Opposition Period:

    During the two-month opposition period, third parties can raise objections to your trademark registration. If there are no objections, or if they are resolved in your favour, your trademark will proceed to registration.

     

    1. Registration Certificate:

    If your trademark application is successful, you will receive a registration certificate from the UK IPO. This certificate proves your exclusive rights to use the trademark within the UK.

     

    1. Maintain and Protect Your Trademark:

    It’s essential to monitor and renew your trademark periodically to maintain its protection. Trademarks in the UK are typically valid for ten years, and you can renew them indefinitely.

     

    It’s advisable to seek legal counsel or consult with a trademark lawyer throughout this process to ensure that your application is correctly prepared and to address any potential issues that may arise during the registration process.

  • Creating Child Arrangements for the Festive Season Without a Solicitor

    The festive season is a time of joy and celebration, but for separated/ divorced parents, it can also be a source of stress when it comes to making child arrangements. While involving solicitors is a common route, it’s not the only one. If you find yourself struggling to make arrangements and have limited time to seek legal advice consider the following:-

    Communication is Key
    Regardless of differences, open and honest communication between both parents is crucial. Start by discussing your wishes for the festive period. Be clear about your availability, and listen to the other parent’s concerns and preferences.

    Flexible Scheduling
    Create a flexible schedule that accommodates both parents’ holiday plans. This might involve alternating Christmas and New Year celebrations each year or splitting the day to allow quality time with both parents.

    Consider the Child’s Perspective
    The best interests of the child should always be the main focus when crafting arrangements. Consider your child’s preferences, and any special traditions they may have. If possible, involve your child in the decision-making process to make them feel heard and valued.

    Mediation Services
    If direct communication proves challenging, consider using mediation services. A neutral third party can help facilitate discussions and guide both parents towards a mutually agreeable solution.

    Make Use of Online Tools
    There are numerous apps are designed to assist co-parents in organising and managing child arrangements. They offer facilities such as shared calendars, expense tracking, and communication features, making it easier to coordinate holiday plans.

    Emergency Plans
    Sometimes, despite the best intentions, unforeseen circumstances may arise. Discuss and agree upon contingency plans in case of unexpected events, such as illness, travel disruptions, or other emergencies.

    Creating child arrangements for the festive period without a solicitor is indeed possible with open communication, flexibility, and a commitment to putting the child’s well-being first. While it may require effort and compromise, the reward of a harmonious and stress-free holiday season for both parents and children are worth it.

  • Local Resolution Member, Rhona Royle of Wrigley Claydon, calls for more rights for unmarried couples

    • Change in the law receives overwhelming backing in national poll
    • Cohabiting couples in Oldham are at significant risk if relationship ends
    • Call for change in the law forms centrepiece of Resolution’s Vision for Family Justice as it marks 40th

    Local members of the family justice body Resolution have welcomed new research which shows most people back a change in the law to give cohabiting people more rights.

    Currently, cohabiting couples have few or no rights in the event of a relationship breakdown meaning that unlike married couples there is no mechanism for splitting assets. This is despite a huge growth in the number of couples and families that cohabit rather than marry.

    A nationwide poll carried out by Whitestone Insight on behalf of Resolution found around half of cohabitees are unaware that they lack rights should they split up.

    • 59% of people polled back better legal protections for cohabiting people.
    • 74% of cohabitees agree that ‘the current laws surrounding cohabitation are unfit for today’s modern society’.
    • 75% of Resolution members surveyed said they support a change in the law to provide basic rights to cohabiting couples.

    Asked about their concerns in the event of a relationship ending, 35% said they feared having nowhere to live – if a property is in one partner’s name the other partner has no automatic claim on it in the event of a breakup. One in three said they feared significant financial hardship.

    According to House of Commons Library research 1.5 million couples cohabited in 1996 but that figure increased by 144% over the following 25 years to 3.6 million in 2021. According to the recent Resolution polling 83% of respondents believe that cohabiting will become even more popular in future.

    Rhona Royle a family lawyer in the Oldham area, said, “Today’s research demonstrates the urgent need for greater legal protection. Many cohabitees believe they are protected by ‘common-law marriage’ – but this is a myth and, sadly, they only discover this once it is too late.

    “That’s why I’m joining Resolution’s call for a change in the law to ensure cohabiting couples in the Oldham area and elsewhere are not left in dire financial straits should their relationship come to an end.”

    The call comes as Resolution launches its Vision for Family Justice in Parliament this week, highlighting a number of areas where reform is needed in order to better help families who are facing separation or divorce.

    Grant Cameron, National Chair of Resolution, said, “It’s great to have so much support across the country for our call for change from people like Rhona. For 40 years, Resolution has been campaigning for reforms which help couples who separate to do so more amicably and constructively – which is why cohabitation reform is front and centre of our Vision for Family Justice.

    “The shape of families across England and Wales is changing – and our laws need to keep up.”

     

    The Vision for Family Justice can be found here.

    For more information or to speak with a Resolution representative please contact –

    Rhona Royle;

    rmr@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    0161 624 6811

  • Christmas and New Years Opening Times 2023/24

    Here are our closing and opening times for our offices over the Christmas and New Year period.
     
    If you have an enquiry while our offices are closed, you can send us an email and we will get back to you on our return.
  • World Snooker Tour threatens legal action against five of its own players

    The World Snooker Tour (“WST”) has threatened legal action against five of its own players for breach of contract if they take part in a non-sanctioned event in Macau.

    Former world champions Mark Selby and John Higgins, this year’s world champion Luca Brecel, Ali Carter and  Thepchaiya Un-Nooh have all pulled out of the WST’s Northern Ireland Open in order to take part in a financially lucrative exhibition in Macau.

    World number one Ronnie O’Sullivan is lending his support to the players after describing WST’s stance as ‘b******s, trying to scare players like that’.

    The players claim the threat from WST are without merit as they have not entered the Northern Ireland Open and therefore haven’t pulled out of any WST events and are heading to Macau in their own time.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood.  Our litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in the litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • McLaren seeks at least $23 million in damages from Alex Palou

    It has been reported that McLaren is seeking at least $23m from IndyCar champion Alex Palou after the driver reneged on his contract for 2024.

    According to a claim filed in the High Court of Justice Business and Property Courts of England and Wales Commercial Court, Palou had agreed that he had “no outstanding obligation under any contract or agreement” that would prevent him from joining McLaren once the 2023 IndyCar season ended.

    However, after rejecting Chip Ganassi Racing for McLaren, Palou then performed a U-turn and rejected McLaren for Chip Ganassi Racing.

    Had the original deal with McLaren come into being Palou would have raced for McLaren’s IndyCar project alongside a test and reserve role with the F1 team ahead of a future switch to the world championship. Palou took part in a year-long programme with McLaren including private test sessions and his FP1 debut at the US Grand Prix last October.

    A McLaren spokesman said, “We have a contract, so it’s now in the legal process we filed in London courts last week against him both as a person and his business entity, and we’ll just let the legal proceedings carry the situation forward.”

     

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood.  Our litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in the litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

  • Maggies Culture Crawl 2023

    The Wrigley Claydon team took part in Maggie’s Culture Crawl 2023, an event raising money to support people with cancer.

    Maggie's Culture Crawl 2023 Oldham
  • Macmillan’s World’s Biggest Coffee Morning 2023

    This year we took part in MacMillan’s World’s Biggest Coffee Morning and raised £200

  • LIV golfer Patrick Reed files defamation lawsuit against Golf Channel and commentator Brandel Chamblee

    LIV Golf League player Patrick Reed‘s $750 million defamation claims against the Golf Channel, several of its commentators and other golf writers and media outlets, has been dismissed by a Judge in Florida.

    Reed had complained that the defendants had been “spreading lies” about him during the battle between LIV Golf and the PGA Tour.

    The Judge ruled that Reed’s complaints fell short of alleging sufficient facts showing the defendants had actual malice when making comments about him, “which is fatal to each defamation claim.”

    He also stated “……… many of the statements are not about Reed. Some statements are about LIV Golf, of which Reed is a member, but not specifically about Reed. Others are matters of opinion or permissible rhetorical hyperbole. Still others are statements of fact, the truth of which are not challenged”.

    Suffering a dispute can have serious implications on you and your livelihood.  Our litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Vijay Srivastava or Shalish Mehta in the litigation department on 0161 624 6811(Option 6) or email vjs@wrigleyclaydon.com or sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.