The judge in the Scarle estate dispute, in which an elderly married couple were found dead in their Essex home, has ruled that there was not enough medical evidence to determine who died first. As such the commorientes rule was invoked and the elder was deemed to have died first.
The couple, who had both been married previously and had children from their previous marriages, sadly died in October 2016 from hypothermia. The autopsy evidence was confused by differing temperatures in different rooms in the house and the possibility that an intruder might have disturbed the scene.
It became important to decide who had died first because joint assets would pass, all be it briefly, to the second to die by survivorship and then to their children.
This case highlights the need not only to make a will, but also to consider what assets will pass under that will and whether or not inheritance should be conditional upon surviving the first to die by a specified period.
For more information on wills and probate please call Rachel Damianou or Jyoti Patel on (0161) 624 6811 (option 3) or email email@example.com
Latest posts by Rachel Damianou (see all)
- Dying to be heard - 14th May 2020
- Government considers how wills should be signed in light of the COVID-19 situation - 11th May 2020
- Update on Probate applications in light of COVID-19 restrictions - 11th May 2020
- Cryptocurrency owners – have you made a will? - 9th January 2020
- Wrigley Claydon’s Top Resolutions for 2020 - 19th December 2019