A government consultation paper plans to protect consumers from unresolved debts stemming from unfair county court judgments (CCJs) in a move to tackle concerns about ‘rogue companies’ such as parking enforcement businesses.
Concerns were raised that some companies are deliberately sending claims to incorrect addresses.
This can severely impact credit ratings and the issue may come to light only years later when an application for a mortgage or loan is rejected.
• Striking a CCJ from the register immediately once unknown debts are resolved and a judge agrees the person was unaware
• Protecting consumers who do not receive mail because it is sent to an old address
• A government information campaign providing a ‘centralised, trusted source’ to raise awareness and help people deal with unresolved debts.
Justice minister Dominic Raab said: ‘Debts should be paid, not exploited by a minority of cowboys who need reining in.’
Over the past four years, the number of CCJs has risen by almost two thirds (59%), with more than one million issued in 2016.
The government is also considering standardised practice across parking companies, eliminating unfair charges and reducing the instances of claims where the consumer may be unaware of a parking charge being applied.
Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our business solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf. Call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email email@example.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.
Latest posts by Vijay Srivastava (see all)
- Glasgow Coma Scale - 10th October 2019
- World’s Biggest Coffee Morning – 27th September 2019 - 23rd September 2019
- End of an Era as Oldham Magistrates’ Court gets demolished - 12th September 2019
- High Court employs ‘intention to target’ approach to determine application of EU/UK law in online trade mark infringement case - 1st May 2019
- “Third time’s a charm…” - 1st May 2019