Category: News

  • Could a format infringement be behind the sale of The Great British Bake Off…?

    Could a format infringement be behind the sale of The Great British Bake Off…?

    Producers of The Great British Bake Off reportedly engaged lawyers and threatened to sue the BBC.

    It has been reported that the BBC was involved in a dispute with Love Productions back in 2014 over a hairdressing competition called Hair, which originally been shown on BBC3.

    Produced by the BBC, Hair documented the quest to find the country’s best amateur hair stylist through a series of hairdressing challenges, similar to the challenges on Bake Off.

    Love Productions argued that Hair effectively “ripped-off” the Bake Off format. Love Productions lawyer said it was the clearest cut case they’d seen of a format infringement.

    The matter did not reach the court however; the dispute may have caused a breakdown in relationships with the BBC resulting in the sale of the show to Channel 4.

    If you have a brand, something you have invented, or an original piece of work that you have written and someone infringes your rights we can help. We can assist you in securing an injunction and/or damages or account of profits and the delivery up and destruction of the offending item. If you have been accused of infringing someone’s intellectual property rights then we can also help by raising various defences and minimizing your liability.

    If you feel you have an intellectual property case and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call us on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Oldham Conveyancing solicitors receive custom cupcakes!

    Oldham Conveyancing solicitors receive custom cupcakes!

    Our Oldham conveyancing solicitors were thrilled to receive a lovely surprise this week from a grateful client. Conveyancing exec Tracy Rostern was sent a box of conveyancing themed cupcakes from a recent customer!

    The unique and unexpected gift was from husband and wife Rabnawaz and Saima Inayat, who Tracy assisted with a conveyancing transaction. They left a lovely testimonial for Tracy to go with the cupcakes;

    “I would like to thank you for your conveyance services, our case was not an easy one, but your patience, hard work and constantly updating and keeping us informed kept us going, you have really looked after us really well, we really appreciate what you have done for us and look forward to using your services again, I hope you and your team enjoy the cupcakes.  Once again thank you:) Kind regards, Rabnawaz and Saima”

    Aren’t they brilliant?!

    Oldham conveyancing solicitors

    Oldham conveyancing solicitors

  • Our Oldham Will solicitors take part in Dr Kershaw’s Will Week 2016

    Our Oldham Will solicitors take part in Dr Kershaw’s Will Week 2016

    We are taking part in Dr Kershaw’s Will Week from Monday 3rd to Sunday 9th October 2016.  During the week we will prepare Wills for clients free of charge in lieu of a donation to the Hospice. Our usual fees are £95 for a single will and £175 for mirror wills. The idea is to enc

  • Join us at our Macmillan Coffee Morning

    Join us at our Macmillan Coffee Morning

    We’re holding a Coffee Morning to raise money for Macmillan.

    When: 10am on Friday 30th September 2016

    Where: Wrigley Claydon offices, 29-33 Union Street, Oldham, OL1 1HH

    Come along for a coffee, cake and a chat if you are in Oldham and help us raise funds for a good cause. If yo

  • Consumer Rights solicitor – were you affected by the VW emissions fixing scandal?

    Consumer Rights solicitor – were you affected by the VW emissions fixing scandal?

    Hundreds of thousands of VW, Audi and SEAT owners are set to use new ‘class action’ rights which comes into force on 29 September 2016 pursuant to under the Consumer Rights Act, to sue Volkswagen for fixing the exhaust gas checks on its diesel cars to make them appear more green.

    VW has put aside £5billion to cope with the recall crisis however the final bill could force it into bankruptcy.

    Steve Fowler, editor-in chief of Auto Express, said: ‘If Volkswagen are cheating in one emissions test, how many more have they been cheating on? This could be just the tip of the iceberg. If one manufacturer is cheating, what about the others? The silence has been deafening. You would expect other car makers to be making hay at the expense of a rival but they are not. The industry should be shouting from the roof tops that they are clean. They should come out quickly and say they are not cheating.’

    Under the Consumer Rights Act you have an early right to reject goods that are unsatisfactory quality, unfit for purpose or not as described and get a full refund. We can help you obtain the result that you deserve.

    If you feel you have consumer issue and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call us on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Did you purchase a vehicle based on its emissions? Or are emissions ratings irrelevant when you are considering the choice of a car?

  • Remember a Charity in your Will Week 2016

    Remember a Charity in your Will Week 2016

    Once again we are showing our support for ‘Remember a Charity in your Will Week’ from Monday 12th to Sunday 18th September 2016.

    The week, organised by Remember A Charity, aims to increase awareness of the importance of charitable legacies, and encourage more people to think about charitable giving in Wills. Whilst the decision of where, and indeed who, your money, assets and estate go to after your passing is yours, many people do not even consider charitable organisations. Many think of their spouse and children or grandchildren first, then close family and friends. Leaving something to anyone outside that close circle is rare, and certainly leaving anything to an charity doesn’t enter many people’s minds.

    ‘Remember A Charity in your Will Week’ serves to counter that. Participating solicitors offer a gentle reminder about the benefits of leaving something to a charity or voluntary organisation that is close to your heart. Whether it’s a national (or international) or local, independent charity, any contribution you wish to make after your death, big or small, can be arranged. Cancer and other illness or medical charities are popular, including hospices, mental health and drug and alcohol related charities. Animal, children, homelessness, domestic abuse charities are also common but the decision is yours.

    The gift of charitable legacies is a vital financial source for many voluntary organisation and a life-blood to those accessing the charity’s services.

    If you feel you would like to include a charity in your Will please speak to our Will writing solicitors Oldham. Whether you are creating a new Will or wish to amend an existing one our friendly and experienced team can help you. Please call us on 0161 624 6811.
  • Pokémon (No) Go – ensure you’re not trespassing for Pokémon

    Pokémon (No) Go – ensure you’re not trespassing for Pokémon

    Players of the recent phenomenon Pokémon Go should be careful, in case they find themselves facing court proceedings for trespass on private land.

    If there is a real and apparent risk that the gathering of Pokémon hunters could cause injury to property or people, there is a case law that suggests a landowner can obtain an injunction against ‘Persons Unknown’ prohibiting them from causing the threatened nuisance or trespass.

    It is unlikely that Nintendo, as the producer of ‘Pokémon Go’ would be liable since it does not encourage trespassing and a disclaimer appears on screen at the start of the game. However, a man in the US said strangers started lingering outside of his home with at least five people knocking on his door and has commenced a lawsuit.

    While the occasional misguided trespass is unlikely to result in court proceedings, repeat offenders may find themselves facing an injunction.

    If you find that your property has been subject to trespass or any nuisance or indeed you have been served with an injunction for whatever reason then we suggest you speak to Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department. He can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Please call our harassment and trespass solicitors on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com
  • The successful appeal of Metroline in an employment tribunal sounds a new note says employment law solicitor

    Mr Ibrahim Ajaj was an employee at Metroline West Ltd (“Metroline”) for 10 years and was dismissed for gross misconduct for deceptively alleging that he could no longer perform his duties after an injury at work. His allegation was supported by an occupational health advisor and physiotherapist.

    However Metroline decided to covertly survey him and hired an external doctor to verify his injuries. The findings by the external doctor revealed that Mr Ajaj’s injuries were inconsistent with his descriptions and Metroline suspected he had made his injuries up to profit from sick pay.

    He was invited to a disciplinary hearing, and dismissed. Thereafter he issued legal proceedings. The Employment Appeal Tribunal decided that the Employer had a potentially fair reason to dismiss Mr Ajaj.

    Where does the Tribunal decision leave the employee who takes the occasional ‘sick day’?

    Can you be dismissed for ‘taking a sick day’ for no apparent good reason? At the outset, few employers would go to the lengths of surveying their employees for a few days off sick. Secondly, in many cases it might be disproportionate to dismiss an employee for calling in sick because, say, he is hung over. However, lying is dishonesty and dishonesty can facilitate an employee’s dismissal. In any event, the employer’s handbook can be consulted to fully understand the implications.

    There is also an implied relationship of trust between employer and employee that shouldn’t be taken lightly. If an employee takes multiple days off, while deceptively alleging to be sick, the question begs whether he should be working at a job he has little passion for.

    It is important for both employers and employees to understand their obligations and rights.

    If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our employment law solicitor, John Porter, on 0161 624 6811 or email jap@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Daughter and step mother locked in bitter will dispute

    Daughter and step mother locked in bitter will dispute

    A daughter who was left nothing in her late father’s £1million will is battling her stepmother over the fortune.

    Danielle Ames told the Court she ‘idolised’ her father, Michael Ames, that he was her ‘best friend’ and that he ‘doted’ on her as his only child. However, she was shocked when her father, who ran a glazing business, died in 2013 and left his entire fortune to Danielle’s step-mother, Elaine Ames.

    The daughter is now trying to convince a Judge that she is due £300,000 as ‘reasonable provision’ from her father’s estate.

    However, her stepmother is arguing that her late husband deliberately cut his daughter out, as he had a strong work ethic and believed grown-up children should ‘look after themselves.’ She told the Judge that he had given the daughter financial support to set up her own picture framing business and therefore the will makes reasonable financial provision for all parties.

    The daughter and her family currently have a monthly deficit of over £2,000 and she is struggling to make ends meet. She also has debts of £10,000.

    However, the stepmother said that Ms Ames is a grown up, ‘fit and able to work’ and ought to stand on her own two feet.

    She told the Judge that her husband had promised her that his money would be used to look after her in her old age. She detailed a ‘list of ailments’ she is afflicted with.

    The bulk of Mr Ames’ assets are tied up in the four-bedroom £650,000 family home in Hoddesdon, where Mrs Ames still lives. She says she would be forced to sell the home she has lived in for 13 years, if ordered to satisfy Ms Ames’ claim.

    Urging both women to put their animosity aside, Judge Halpern told them their personal feelings about each other were of little relevance to the case.

    As at September 2016, the hearing continues.

    Disputes can be very complex and require expert legal guidance to resolve matters as fairly as possible. At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients. As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively ensuring that all of our clients are happy with each stage of the process and the outcome of proceedings.

    If you are looking for will dispute advice do not hesitate to contact us. Call 0161 624 6811 to speak to to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Neighbour dispute concerning overgrown trees

    Neighbour dispute concerning overgrown trees

    A millionaire businessman has been ordered to chop down 80ft trees in the grounds of his mansion after a neighbour dispute that they blocked out sunlight and could crush their homes.

    James Turnbull’s £1.4million estate borders a row of gardens in the upmarket village of Bridge of Weir, Renfrewshire. Neighbours claimed the trees were ruining their properties and stopping sunlight from getting into their homes.

    One neighbour claimed he slept in his living room in case trees collapsed and fell into his bedroom and also stated that he was forced to switch on lights during the day due to trees blocking the natural light.

    He took his complaint to the Scottish Government after Renfrewshire Council rejected his earlier application to have the trees cut down on the basis that ‘significant gaps’ within the hedge allowed sunlight to pass through and dismissed a bid to have them cut down.

    However, Government reporter Robert Seaton has now ruled the trees should be chopped by October. He stated, “The removal of these trees should be sufficient to address the matters of sunlight and daylight to the appellants’ properties and their gardens as well as the issues of the dominance of hedge and needle fall.”

    Although the above is a Scottish case there are many courses of action you can take when dealing with a neighbour dispute in order to maintain cordial relations.

    Speak to Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. He can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.