Category: News

  • Intellectual Property case against Hepburn’s eldest son…

    Audrey Hepburn’s eldest son Sean Ferrer is being sued by The Audrey Hepburn Children’s Fund, the charity he helped establish because it says he is interfering with its attempts to raise money for children. Money was being raised largely by exhibiting her clothing – some created by fashion designer Givenchy.

    The charity is saying that he has spent the last four years becoming increasingly ‘hostile’ to its use of Hepburn’s intellectual property.

    It says he ‘seeks to entirely control, limit and prohibit’ the use of the intellectual property unless it pays a ‘significant portion’ of money raised to another charity of his choice, ‘or to simply preclude’ it from using the intellectual property at all.

    The charity is suing Ferrer for intentional interference with contractual relationships, and seeking damages. It is also pursuing an injunction to stop him from registering any domain names based on Hepburn’s name.

    If you have a brand, something you have invented, or an original piece of work that you have written and someone infringes your rights we can help. We can assist you in securing an injunction and/or damages or account of profits and the delivery up and destruction of the offending item. If you have been accused of infringing someone’s intellectual property rights then we can also help by raising various defences and minimizing your liability.

    If you feel you have an intellectual property case and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call us on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • New Senior Partner at Wrigley Claydon solicitors Oldham

    New Senior Partner at Wrigley Claydon solicitors Oldham

    It’s been a busy time of late at Wrigley Claydon solicitors Oldham as a number of personnel changes have taken place, including the retirement of a Senior Partner.

    Godfrey Pickles is retiring as Senior Partner and handing over to Vijay Srivastava.

    Mr Pickles has been with the firm for more than 30 years. He has worked over a broad range of domestic and commercial law matters, including wills, probate, tax planning, landlord and tenant matters and private wealth management, and also serviced a major building society.

    Mr Pickles, a keen walker and golfer, is member of Todmorden Golf Club and a Burnley FC supporter.

    Mr Srivastava is taking over the role as Senior Partner and has also been with Wrigley Claydon for 30 years. He attended Hulme Grammar School before studying law at Leeds University. He completed his solicitors professional exams in London before being invited by Wrigley Claydon to undertake his articles of association, the final step to becoming a solicitor.

    Two years after joining the Oldham firm, he was invited to join the partnership and became one of the youngest partners in the country.

    solicitors OldhamPartner John Porter said, “Vijay is well-known in the Oldham area. He specialises in civil litigation and dealt with a number of high-value cases in the High Court while also being joint Managing Partner of the firm.”

    Married with two children, Mr Srivastava is also chairman of governors at Hulme Grammar School, a trustee of Francis House Children’s Hospice and active in his local church.

    Mr Srivastava said, “It is an honour to have been appointed Senior Partner of a firm that has such a long and distinguished heritage and to follow in the footsteps of many illustrious legal minds who have contributed to the success of Wrigley Claydon.”

  • Hepburn’s sons fail to agree how to split late mum Audrey’s memorabilia

    Hepburn’s sons fail to agree how to split late mum Audrey’s memorabilia

    The late actress Audrey Hepburn, who died in 1993, left memorabilia including hats, scarves, jewellery, posters, costumes, photos, scripts and awards, which caused a dispute between her two sons, Sean Ferrer and his half-brother Luca Dotti who each wanted a tangible piece of their late mother.

    Hepburn had left her sons a 50/50 cut of everything she had but no strict guidelines as to who received which items.

    The two brothers attempted to mediate the case before going to trial.

    The brothers both signed a memorabilia agreement which will divide the items between the two of them while they are still attempting to resolve remaining issues.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult process of will disputes a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients.

    As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for will disputes advice please contact us. Call 0161 785 3534 to speak to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Do you think that it is a good idea to mediate before going to trial?

  • New minimum wage rates – ensure you are compliant…

    The new minimum wage rates came into force from 1 st October 2016. In light of the subsequent Autumn statement and the forecasts of the Office for Budget Responsibility on wage stagnation, we take a brief look on what they are, how they affect young people and how employers can comply with legislation.

    Age Group Wage (£ per hour)
    Apprentices 3.40
    16-17 year olds 4.00
    18-20 year olds 5.55
    21-24 year olds 6.95

    The above rates are applicable to trainees, apprentices, foreign workers and agricultural workers. It is a criminal offence not to pay workers less than the minimum wage. HMRC has the right to carry out a check on any employer not complying with their obligations, as well as imposing a fine on the offenders.

    Voluntary Living Wage

    This is separate from the UK Voluntary Living Wage requirements, whose obligations are not mandatory to follow but discretionary. The current rate for the Voluntary Living Wage for all those who are age 25 and above is currently £8.20 per hour, but will rise to £8.45 per hour.

    Employers

    Have you been paying your employees, including your apprentices, the lawful rate? It is imperative that employees have contracts of employment, particulars and are paid lawfully.

    If you have any queries regarding the new minimum wage rates, or to arrange a review of your employment practice, please contact our Employment specialist John Porter on 0161 624 6811 or email jap@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Amicable divorce for Hollywood couple Garner and Affleck

    Jennifer Garner is to reportedly file for divorce from Ben Affleck. They had been married for nearly 12 years.

    The couple split in June 2015, however, since then there has been reports the two were reconciling.

    Ben Affleck recently praised Jennifer Garner as being “the greatest mom in the world.” The couple have three children together.

    “No matter what happens, Ben and Jen are committed to raising their family as one unit and will continue to do so as it has worked for them,” said a source close to the couple.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier. We are experienced family lawyers and can assist you with the legal aspects of any family situation in which you may find yourself. We deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for family advice then please call 0161 785 3521 to speak to Terri Pickup in our Family Department or email tp@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Do you think that it is possible to remain friends after a divorce and raise children together?

  • Forged will lands accountant with £1.3m legal bill

    An accountant forged his dead mother’s will to take control of a slice in his family’s £160million palm oil business.

    Girish Dahyabhai Patel from north London, used a blank document, pre-signed by his mother, before adding a will around it.

    Mr Patel was caught out by forensic analysis, which revealed the faint indentation of her signature elsewhere on the paper.

    At the High Court in London, Judge Andrew Simmonds QC found the will to be a forgery, meaning a previous will – leaving everything to his brother Yashwant – will stand.

    It leaves Girish Patel with legal bills totaling an estimated £1.3million.

    Mr Patel fell out with his three brothers in 2009 with legal cases ongoing in several different countries.

    Yashwant, a doctor who lives in New York, came forward with a will, made in 1986, leaving everything to him.

    The document was approved, but Mr Patel then launched a bid to overturn it, for the first time producing a document he claimed his mother had signed in 2005.

    Judge Simmonds said: ‘I find that there were available to Girish blank papers pre-signed by the deceased which enabled him to forge the will, utilising a genuine but old signature of the deceased.’

    Judge Simmonds’ ruling means that the 1986 will under which Yashwant gets everything – is Mrs Patel’s last true will.

    Wills and Probate disputes can be very complex and require expert legal guidance to resolve matters as fairly as possible.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients.

    As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for dispute advice please contact us. Call 0161 785 3534 to speak to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Probate lawyers and heirs clash over fortune of music icon Prince

    Probate lawyers and heirs clash over fortune of music icon Prince

    A Minnesota probate judge overseeing the estate of Prince has refused to appoint either of two probate lawyers seeking to represent the late music star’s likely heirs in managing his legacy, citing disagreement among the siblings over whom they prefer.

    Prince left behind a fortune believed to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars when he died without a will in April 2016.

    Under Minnesota law, his assets are expected to pass equally to Prince’s younger sister, Tyka Nelson, and five surviving half-siblings, as he had no offspring or spouse and his parents were both deceased.

    But the judge has said he would not formally validate the inheritance of the six siblings until court appeals from various other claims against the estate last year have run their course.

    The judge also cited potential conflicts that could arise from each candidate’s ties with third parties involved in litigation with the estate.

    Wills and Probate disputes can be very complex and require expert legal guidance to resolve matters as fairly as possible.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients. As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for dispute advice please contact us. Call 0161 785 3534 to speak to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Woman in divorce court battle to separate from husband

    Mrs Tini Owens has taken her husband to the Court of Appeal to ask three judges for a divorce because he makes her feel ‘unloved, isolated and alone’.

    In 2016 Mrs Owens failed to persuade a family court judge to allow her to divorce her husband but Mr Hugh Owens is opposed to the divorce even though his wife had an affair in 2013 and said they still had a ‘few years’ to enjoy together in life; they have been married 38 years.

    Mrs Owens could have to live next door until at least February 2020 because in England and Wales a couple must be separated for five years for a divorce to be allowed without the consent of both parties.

    If Lord Justice Munby and the two other appeal judges overturn the decision it would be a landmark ‘no fault’ divorce case, where a spouse does not have to prove that his or her partner has done anything wrong.

    Mr Owens, runs a successful fruit and vegetable growing company with a £7million annual turnover. He and Mrs Owen are the two main shareholders. They also have a property company and are said to own four homes between them.

    Sir James said the job of appeal judges was to ‘apply the law’. He said they would examine legislation laid down by Parliament and said, ‘It is not a ground for divorce if you find yourself in a wretchedly unhappy marriage – people may say it should be.’

    They are expected to publish a ruling soon.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make the difficult divorce process a little easier. We are experienced family lawyers and can assist you with the legal aspects of any family situation in which you may find yourself. We deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for family advice then please call 0161 785 3521 to speak to Terri Pickup in our Family Department or email tp@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Do you think that a spouse should be allowed a divorce if there is no fault by the other party?

  • Beyoncé sued over intellectual property rights…

    Beyoncé is being sued for $20 million by the estate of a late internet star who is sampled in her song and video Formation.

    The estate of Anthony Barré, also known as Messy Mya, alleges in a filed federal lawsuit that Beyoncé used a sample of Mya in the single and its video without permission.

    The sampling is not heard in a digitally purchased version of Formation from Beyoncé’s album Lemonade. Both the song and the album are nominated in the 2017 Grammy Awards.

    If you have a brand, something you have invented, or an original piece of work that you have written and someone infringes your rights we can help. We can assist you in securing an injunction and/or damages or account of profits and the delivery up and destruction of the offending item. If you have been accused of infringing someone’s intellectual property rights then we can also help by raising various defences and minimising your liability.

    If you feel you have an intellectual property rights case and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call us on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Increased maintenance payments for ex wife who invested money ‘unwisely’…

    Increased maintenance payments for ex wife who invested money ‘unwisely’…

    Maria Mills received a £230,000 lump sum along with £1,100 monthly maintenance payments when she split from her husband Graham after 13 years of marriage.

    But since the divorce in 2002 Mrs Mills invested the money ‘unwisely’ in London properties, landing herself in debt because of her ‘poor’ decisions.

    Mr Mills argued he ‘should not be the insurer against his ex wife’s poor financial decisions’, saying it was unfair that he should ‘pick up the tab’ years after they split.

    However, he has now been ordered to increase Mrs Mills’ monthly payments to £1,441 so she is ‘able to meet her basic needs’.

    It was held that the Judge in the first court action, had calculated the Mrs Mills’ ‘needs’ at £1,441 a month, but had gone on to order that her monthly maintenance should not be increased from £1,100.

    But the Appeal Court said that ‘shortfall’ was unexplained and left Mrs Mills out of pocket. Mrs Mills would not be able to move towards independence. The Appeal Court further stated that Mr Mills has and had the ability to make the maintenance payments asked for.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier. We are experienced family lawyers and can assist you with the legal aspects of any family situation in which you may find yourself. We deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for family advice then please call 0161 785 3521 to speak to Terri Pickup in our Family Department or email tp@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Do you think that it is fair that the wife was able to go back to court to ask for increased maintenance payments?