Category: Litigation & Disputes

  • Nestlé lose “shape mark” attempt to prevent copycat KitKats

    Nestlé lose “shape mark” attempt to prevent copycat KitKats

    Nestlé has lost the latest round of its seven year battle with rivals Cadbury to trademark the shape of the KitKat bar in the UK. The Court of Appeal ruled that the four-finger design had “no inherent distinctiveness”.

    Nestlé’s appeal followed a High Court ruling in January 2016 that blocked the trademark attempt.

    The European Court of Justice had previously found that the four-fingered shape, was not distinctive enough to merit a trademark and that such a designation would not comply with European law.

    The ruling clears the way for competitors, including the major supermarkets as well as other confectioners, to produce their own copycat KitKats without fear of legal consequences.

    Nestle could potentially try to take the case to the UK Supreme Court.

    The case turned on whether the product’s shape was sufficiently distinctive to the brand to prevent any other manufacturer using a similar format. Protected “shape marks” include Toblerone, which successfully trademarked its “zigzag prism” shape.

    Intellectual property solicitors

    If you have a brand, something you have invented, or an original piece of work that you have written and someone infringes your rights we can help. We can assist you in securing an injunction and/or damages or account of profits and the delivery up and destruction of the offending item. If you have been accused of infringing someone’s intellectual property rights then we can also help by raising various defences and minimising your liability.

    If you feel you have an intellectual property case and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call our intellectual property solicitors on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Record fine and reprimand for PwC

    Record fine and reprimand for PwC

    Accounting firm PwC has been fined a record £5m and severely reprimanded over its auditing of collapsed property services group Connaught by The Financial Reporting Council (FRC).

    Social housing specialist Connaught had £220m of debt when it went bust in 2010.

    The FRC found evidence of misconduct by PwC and retired partner Stephen Harrison.

    Mr Harrison was fined £150,000 and also reprimanded.

    PwC was also ordered to pay the FRC’s legal costs and make an interim payment of £1.5m.

    Contractual dispute solicitors Oldham

    Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our professional negligence solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf to negotiate a settlement, arrange mediation or represent you in court. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Housebuilders to set aside £m to tackle leasehold dispute

    Housebuilders to set aside £m to tackle leasehold dispute

    Taylor Wimpey, one of the UK’s biggest housebuilders, has set aside £130m and apologised to home buyers in a dispute over sharply rising fees.

    It is the first major builder to apologise after criticism for leaving customers with onerous leasehold deals.

    The contracts meant that ground rents, which are paid to owners of the property, doubled every 10 years.

    MPs have described the situation as a “national scandal” and the “PPI of the house building industry”.

    Other builders have also been criticised for drawing up similar contracts, but are yet to set aside compensation.

    Leasehold dispute solicitors

    Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our litigation and specialist leasehold dispute solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf to negotiate a settlement, arrange mediation, or represent you in court.

    Call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.
  • Contract dispute between Sports Direct and Rangers FC

    Contract dispute between Sports Direct and Rangers FC

    Sports Direct and Newcastle United owner billionaire Mike Ashley has won the latest round of a High Court fight with Rangers Football Club over a merchandise deal said to result in the Rangers getting about 7p of every £1 spent.

    Sports Direct group say Rangers’ directors wrongly terminated a contract through which branded products, including kits, were sold, and are seeking damages.

    Rangers’ directors dispute their claim and wanted a judge to call a halt to the litigation. They claim that Sports Direct pocketed too much money from the deal.

    Deputy High Court Judge Richard Millett has decided Ashley should be allowed to continue with the damages claim.

    He announced his decision in a written ruling after analysing competing arguments on whether litigation should stop at a High Court hearing in London.

    The judge gave no date for the next hearing.

    Contract dispute solicitor

    Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our litigation solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf to negotiate a settlement, arrange mediation, or represent you in court.

    Call our contract dispute solicitor Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    Designed by Freepik

  • Professional negligence case finds against property agent and lawyer who failed to provide purchase deeds

    Professional negligence case finds against property agent and lawyer who failed to provide purchase deeds

    A recent judgement has been made in the professional negligence case of Adams v Atlas International Property Services Ltd which saw many individuals lose their homes which they had purchased during the Spanish property boom.

    Purchasers in England had bought property in Spain after seeing adverts placed by English agents for the developer and who received the purchase price in instalments.

    Following confirmation that the purchasers wanted to buy a property the agent arranged for Spanish lawyers to carry out the conveyancing. The property developers were unable to give clean title to the property, due to a bank charge, and subsequently became insolvent.

    Final completion monies were paid at a completion meeting and keys to the property were given to the purchasers but no signed purchase deed was provided. The bank subsequently sought possession against the purchasers who did not have good title. The purchasers therefore claimed against the agents and Spanish lawyer alleging negligence, breach of fiduciary duty and conspiracy.

    The court granted judgement against the agents for the purchase price as well as damages for distress, inconvenience and loss of amenity. As against the Spanish lawyer the court granted judgement for negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.

    Professional negligence solicitors

    Suffering a financial or contractual dispute can have serious implications on your business. Our professional negligence solicitors will quickly and efficiently put your case together and act on your behalf to negotiate a settlement, arrange mediation, or represent you in court.

    Call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com. We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.
  • Commercial boundary dispute

    Commercial boundary dispute

    Giovanni Jacovelli, who runs the Conwy Valley Maze in North Wales, says he has been subjected to repeated threats by Terrence Maitland, who lets out a holiday cottage on neighbouring land over a post put on the boundary between the properties.

    In footage filmed by Mr Jacovelli, Mr Maitland is heard shouting, “That post is staying. You touch it and I’ll f****** bury you.”

    He also says, “It’s my property” and “touch my post and I’ll destroy you… I’ll rip your head off.”

    Mr Jacovelli has stated that Mr Maitland’s aggression has forced him to change the maze to keep visitors away from the neighbouring property.

    The bitter dispute led Mr Maitland being issued with a restraining order and the pair appearing on Channel 5’s The Nightmare Neighbour Next Door.

    Commercial boundary dispute

    We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    If you find yourself in a commercial boundary dispute then call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    How important is it you to have good relations with your neighbours?

  • Parking dispute between neighbours reaches County Court

    Bankers Andrew and Penny McSpadden have been involved in a parking dispute with finance company boss Sheriar Bradbury for a number of years over the size of the car parking bays outside the converted church they share in Hampstead.

    The dispute escalated when art dealers Mary and Yuval Hanina paid £1.45m to buy the third house in the three-home development for their doctor daughter Sophie.

    Mary Hanina claims her daughter’s space has been squeezed into an unusable slither between the other two spaces where only a ‘professional driver’ could park.

    However, the McSpaddens, who are also accused of trespassing on Dr Hanina’s space, claim they are doing nothing wrong and that the problem has come from Mr Bradbury taking up more room than he should.

    In response Mr Bradbury claims the whole dispute which has now reached the Central London County Court is a waste of time and could easily be solved by everyone parking a few inches along.

    The court also heard the parties are fighting over the use of a bin storage area, which the McSpaddens insist is theirs. They deny that their neighbours have an automatic right to dump their rubbish in the facility.

    Judge Nicholas Parfitt said he would give his judgment at a later date.

    If you find yourself in dispute with your neighbours then call Shalish Mehta in our civil and commercial litigation department on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    We can advise you on the appropriate course of action and assist with any legal documents or proceedings that may occur.

    How important is it you to have good relations with your neighbours?

  • Intellectual Property case against Hepburn’s eldest son…

    Audrey Hepburn’s eldest son Sean Ferrer is being sued by The Audrey Hepburn Children’s Fund, the charity he helped establish because it says he is interfering with its attempts to raise money for children. Money was being raised largely by exhibiting her clothing – some created by fashion designer Givenchy.

    The charity is saying that he has spent the last four years becoming increasingly ‘hostile’ to its use of Hepburn’s intellectual property.

    It says he ‘seeks to entirely control, limit and prohibit’ the use of the intellectual property unless it pays a ‘significant portion’ of money raised to another charity of his choice, ‘or to simply preclude’ it from using the intellectual property at all.

    The charity is suing Ferrer for intentional interference with contractual relationships, and seeking damages. It is also pursuing an injunction to stop him from registering any domain names based on Hepburn’s name.

    If you have a brand, something you have invented, or an original piece of work that you have written and someone infringes your rights we can help. We can assist you in securing an injunction and/or damages or account of profits and the delivery up and destruction of the offending item. If you have been accused of infringing someone’s intellectual property rights then we can also help by raising various defences and minimizing your liability.

    If you feel you have an intellectual property case and need some legal advice then please speak to Shalish Mehta, our civil and commercial litigation solicitor. Please call us on 0161 785 3534 or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.
  • Hepburn’s sons fail to agree how to split late mum Audrey’s memorabilia

    Hepburn’s sons fail to agree how to split late mum Audrey’s memorabilia

    The late actress Audrey Hepburn, who died in 1993, left memorabilia including hats, scarves, jewellery, posters, costumes, photos, scripts and awards, which caused a dispute between her two sons, Sean Ferrer and his half-brother Luca Dotti who each wanted a tangible piece of their late mother.

    Hepburn had left her sons a 50/50 cut of everything she had but no strict guidelines as to who received which items.

    The two brothers attempted to mediate the case before going to trial.

    The brothers both signed a memorabilia agreement which will divide the items between the two of them while they are still attempting to resolve remaining issues.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult process of will disputes a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients.

    As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for will disputes advice please contact us. Call 0161 785 3534 to speak to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.

    Do you think that it is a good idea to mediate before going to trial?

  • Forged will lands accountant with £1.3m legal bill

    An accountant forged his dead mother’s will to take control of a slice in his family’s £160million palm oil business.

    Girish Dahyabhai Patel from north London, used a blank document, pre-signed by his mother, before adding a will around it.

    Mr Patel was caught out by forensic analysis, which revealed the faint indentation of her signature elsewhere on the paper.

    At the High Court in London, Judge Andrew Simmonds QC found the will to be a forgery, meaning a previous will – leaving everything to his brother Yashwant – will stand.

    It leaves Girish Patel with legal bills totaling an estimated £1.3million.

    Mr Patel fell out with his three brothers in 2009 with legal cases ongoing in several different countries.

    Yashwant, a doctor who lives in New York, came forward with a will, made in 1986, leaving everything to him.

    The document was approved, but Mr Patel then launched a bid to overturn it, for the first time producing a document he claimed his mother had signed in 2005.

    Judge Simmonds said: ‘I find that there were available to Girish blank papers pre-signed by the deceased which enabled him to forge the will, utilising a genuine but old signature of the deceased.’

    Judge Simmonds’ ruling means that the 1986 will under which Yashwant gets everything – is Mrs Patel’s last true will.

    Wills and Probate disputes can be very complex and require expert legal guidance to resolve matters as fairly as possible.

    At Wrigley Claydon, we fight on your behalf to make this difficult time a little easier, whether you are bringing a claim or you are on the receiving end. We are experienced in this field and have won complex cases for our clients.

    As it is an emotional time we deal with our cases sensitively.

    If you are looking for dispute advice please contact us. Call 0161 785 3534 to speak to Shalish Mehta, in our civil and commercial litigation department or email sm@wrigleyclaydon.com.